Rentoul’s clichéd critique is easier blogged than done

22 Dec

John Rentoul charmingly criticised the work of his colleagues across the country with a list of the most over used sentences in journalism for journalisted this week.

Lobbywatcher’s comment on Jon Slattery’s blogpost that repeats the list sums up my sentiments exactly.

No doubt Mr Rentoul, who gets paid a six-figure sum for writing a couple of columns and a few leaders each week, can afford to take his time searching for freshly-minted phrases for his opinion pieces. Those of us who have to rattle off 1,000 words by next deadline on Vince Cable’s future prospects as well as covering the news story in print and online can surely be forgiven for resorting to the odd hackneyed cliché now and again.

I was in Brixton at 8am this morning after leaving the office past 8pm last night, covering what was supposed to be an all day event in 600 words that had to be filed by 11. From a café.On a laptop with iffy wifi and an uncooperative camera lead.

As always I tried my absolute hardest to keep it free of clichés or at least imbue the ones that local news at Christmas demands with a whisper of wit but I am sure I failed to some degree.

I didn’t have any of the top phrases in my copy – although it’s perfectly possible that I could have – but I did have the necessary hilariously dressed pet, a somewhat trite Christmas carol intro and maybe even a couple of hackneyed sentences.

But with a three hour deadline for copy including pictures, interviews and a potted history of the organisation I think I did quite a good job Mr Routoul, thank you very much.

Want to read my masterpiece? Buy the Ham&High. Someone has to pay me for my clichés, crappy puns and Christmas carol intros don’t they?

The list:

  • Learning curve: 771 articles
  • Way beyond: 746 articles
  • A no-brainer: 651 articles
  • Game changer: 524 articles
  • Perfect storm: 520 articles
  • Raising awareness: 405 articles
  • Elephant in the room: 353 articles
  • Not fit for purpose: 327 articles
  • Out of the box: 229 articles
  • What’s not to like?: 206 article

Should the Telegraph ‘crowdsource’ the identities of violent student protesters?

11 Nov

Yesterday’s violence was a bit of a shocker to be honest. I would expect that in Paris or Barcelona but London’s young protesters have kept their cool for at least the last ten years.

They aren’t scenes anyone wants to see – wide eyed bandanered youth with little more on their minds than destruction. It made a mockery in many ways of the legitimate protesters outside. But then maybe that is what some people get like when they are dispossessed by those they voted into power a few short months ago.

Debates of the morality of violent protest aside an interesting point about web-based journalism has come up – The Telegraph are using their considerable online presence and the high social network interest in the protests to name, and one must believe, eventually shame, the protesters that have been caught on camera.

Immediately it feels a bit ‘crimewatch’ to me. But then it’s not that far from what a journalist does everyday, it’s just making innovative use of the social media available. A country wide doorstep if you will.

And yet watching the tweets appear on my timeline it didn’t feel like the journalism I like to think I practice. This just felt like schadenfreude. Looking through the photos for a familiar face and the opportunity to dob in an acquaintance for the thrill of it.

At least on crimewatch we know what the consequences will be if we tell on them. The Telegraph offers no such clarity.

It’s a completely knee-jerk, old fashioned reaction but the dispossessed, recent student in me didn’t really like it.

The Times paywall should reveal all

3 Nov

The figures have been out for almost two days and we still know little more than we ever have about the relative sucesses and failures of The Times paywall.  Even Roy Greenslade is none the wiser and he is very wise.

Robert Andrews at PaidContent has made a good go of making as much sense as possible of the opaque figures. He points out that from a pre-paywall readership of 20 million unique monthly users The Times now claims 105,000 cumulative reader payments in the last four months. Which means, he says, they have managed to get just 0.5 percent of their online audience to pay.

An interesting comparison Andrews makes is to the music streaming website Spotify. He says that the freemium business model demands a 5% base to become valid. While it is clear that the News International paywall has a way to go before it reaches those dizzying heights – but I think the similarities need not end there.

What has always endeared me to Spotify is its ability to change peoples’ perception of their presumed right to free music. It offers a fantastic free service, one many of my friends are quite content with. All the while it ensure the full premium service is affordable and that the added value is simple and quantifiable an obvious to all it’s users – no ads need be endured.

It is this value adding that a simple paywall falls down on. The Times, hidden so securely behind it’s paywall, has little lure for me now. Unlike free-spotify users who continue to use and interact with a brand on a daily if not hourly basis. The switch, when feeling flush or frustrated with advertisements, is a natural one.

The Times does not have this. I don’t visit that home page anymore because it just frustrates me – no one wants a door, digital, or otherwise slammed in their face time and again.

There must be a way to keep people interacting with the interface of The Times without giving away the premium service. I haven’t thought of it yet, but when I do you’ll be the first to know.

In many ways I want the paywall to work – and I wrote this blog saying as much when it was launched – but by releasing figures so opaque figures that, as the head of journalism at my old university George Brock puts it: “Any business journalist on either title [Times or Sunday Times] confronted with this sort of chicanery from another company in the online market would gleefully rip into the executives releasing numbers in such opaque form,”  they aren’t doing anyone any favours.

Tweet in the name of the law – social network training for police is better late than never

2 Nov

A few weeks ago a detective knocked on my door.  They thought a neighbour had been badly attacked on a street late at night but couldn’t identify him.

He was in a coma, his family abroad and his wallet gone – they had a clue he lived next door but had no pictures with which to identify him and no way to contact his next of kin.

Within minutes of logging on to his Facebook page another woman in his block of flats had established contact with the family and provided a library of photographs the detective could use. Except, despite our encouragement and the exceptional circumstances, he wouldn’t.

Raising his eyebrows, as if to say ‘silly old me’ he told us that he wasn’t very good with computers and had never really ‘got round to’ Facebook. So, he smiled hopelessly, if it was all alright with us, he would wait for the girlfriend to arrive at Gatwick.

My neighbour and I were astounded. There was a man was lying in a hospital bed unconscious, a family half way around the world worried sick and no proof positive of his identity.

And on a computer in the next room was a library of photos showing him from every possible angle, a list of contacts at our fingertips and even, conceivably, information about his last movements.

As a journalist and regular facebook and twitter user all I know the power these social networks can provide. It just seemed like such a waste.

So it as a relief that it has been announced that police officers will finally receive training on social networking sites.

Considering Facebook launched in Februrary 2004 (Twitter in 2006) it is outrageous this training has taken over six-year become part of standard training procedure.

As a journalist, feigning ignorance wouldn’t get you very far with your news editor if a rival scooped you with a story from a social network – and why should this be any different in other professions that rely on information?

Officers will now be taught about evidence-gathering on these sites as part of detectives training at the National Policing Improvement Agency. 3,500 detectives pass through the agency’s training courses each year so this is a good start, but in all likelihood my polite but social-network-ly inept detective is likely remain just as bemused as ever.

Apps for Democracy – why Boris should encourage crowdsourcing

1 Oct


Welcome death knell for council propaganda papers

28 Sep

Some really good news this week for local papers everywhere  – the tories have banned the council newspaper.

Eric Pickles has announced that councils will only be allowed to publish free titles four times a year. They will also have to remove any content that praises the council – including quotes from local residents .

Council newspapers have, long before I worked for a local paper, driven me to distraction. It confounds logic that, in a democratic society that prides itself on a free and open press we have let them carry on as long as they have.

Where I live in Whitechapel the ubiquitous East End Life flops infuriatingly onto my doormat every week. I have no choice whether I receive this pseudo-independent paper and it’s presence in my hallway means in times of desperation, it sometimes even gets read.

Few things in the world anger me more than it though. it makes no attempt to fully declare it’s allegiance to the council and at first or even second glance it looks exactly like an independent freesheet.

This paper does not simply fulfil the valid purpose of letting locals know what the council is spending its money on and the services it supplies. It is filled with crimes stories, feel-good features and ‘exclusive’ interviews and the pages are peppered with adverts that should be in struggling local papers.

Funnily enough the one thing they don’t write about is council cock-ups, wasted funds and dodgy dealings. It is the equivalent of having a free government-run national newspaper delivered to every door in country. They don’t even do that in China.

With an annual budget of an astonishing £1.6bn mainly dervived from advertising East End Life  ‘only’ costs the taxpayer £118,000 a year (still a huge amount of money for a piece of council propaganda, particularly as taxpayers also fund a large press office at the council too.)

Last year councillor Tim Archer called for the council to scrap its “propaganda paper” telling them to save £670,000 annually by advertising its vacancies in its local paper, the  East London Advertiser. A famous stalwart of the East End which is now struggling to survive after the loss of council. Hopefully it can expect some level of resurgence in advertising revenue – very much-needed in these turbulent times.

n.b. The Ham&High doesn’t have a weekly council paper  to compete against, we have the fantastic Camden New Journal, so this post is not  simply shadenfreude. I find council papers morally objectionable.

Do real people use Twitter?

2 Jun
© Twitter

© Twitter

Twitter is a social network dominated by people with something to promote. Whether they are journalists – using the network to crowd source content and promote themselves – or politicians – attempting to engage with ‘the public’ – Twitter is in danger of being deviod of ‘real’ people communicating on it.

To find out whether Twitter is a tool used by the masses and not just the mass media, we took to the streets of Islington, north London, to find out what people thought about the social tool and the media’s growing fascination with it.

Hugo, 35, of the Moro restaurant on Exmouth Market, said he found social networking sites such as Facebook “scary”, though did consider Twitter as a useful tool for professionals:

http://abhn841.portfolios.cutlines.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/hugo.mp3

Moya Sarner, 23, a journalism student at City University said she thought that Twitter was mostly used by journalists and politicians, though she did use it:

http://abhn841.portfolios.cutlines.org/wp-content/audio/moya.mp3

Mandy, 20, a student said she used Twitter to ‘stalk’ celebrities and that the tool was good for people in positions of importance:

http://abhn841.portfolios.cutlines.org/wp-content/audio/mandy.mp3

Debbie Arno, 48, a nursery nurse said her children used Twitter and Facebook, though she personally thinks the “whole world has gone crazy” and that life is not private anymore :
http://abhn841.portfolios.cutlines.org/wp-content/audio/debby.mp3

By Richard Partington and Georgia Graham

Brown's 'bigot' was what 24-hour news was made for

2 May

Brown, Brown, Brown, was it really necessary to hammer the final nail into your own coffin?

Tony Blair, BBC sources claim, had his very own microphone that only he and his aides could control. But Tony Blair is far from the norm. Gordon is in good and varied company with his microphone gaffe.

Since the beginning of twenty-four-hour news a microphone has been the downfall of many a slick star and polished politician. And now we have the internet to thank for these gaffes never, ever going away.

CNN’s Kyra Philips branded branded all men “a**holes” and her brother’s wife a “control freak” before crew shut her up. Wish I could be a fly on the wall at their next family Sunday lunch. oops.

Ronald Reagan’s is an old school gaffe – a radio mic gave him away in this one. The US president managed to accidently ‘outlaw’ Russia. And say bombing was to commence in five minutes.

Jesse Jackson – The civil rights campaigner said he wanted to cut Barack Obama’s “nuts off” ahead of a TV interview in 2008 and accused Obama of “speaking down to black people”.

George Bush to Blair – ‘get Syria to get Hezbollah to stop doing this shit’ – ever the diplomat

http://www.youtube.com/v/6Xq3DobSCKQ&hl=en_US&fs=1&

Bush again – making his views on the New York Times journo Adam Clymer perfectly clear. In an election rally in 2000, Bush spotted the writer in the crowd and called him a “major-league a**hole”

Spanish PM Jose Maria Aznar declaring a report he’d just delivered to the European Parliament in 2002 “Vaya conazo que he soltado”. Translated: “What a load of c**p I’ve just delivered.”
http://www.youtube.com/v/dAP2KLmkQRM&hl=en_US&fs=1&

Our very own dashing king in waiting. Well ok, he’s not dashing, he’s not charming and he’s probably never going to be king. But he is a prince and he really doesn’t like having his photo taken – as this clip shows.

Churnalism – The SEO-ers dream

30 Apr
Who wouldn't want to put her in the stocks? credit: Flickr/celebrityvillage

Who wouldn't want to put her in the stocks? credit: Flickr/celebrityvillage

Would you like to see Jordan in the stocks? Is Paris Hilton or Jonathan Ross more likely to give you a headache? How many facts do you know about Russell Crowe, star of the New Robin Hood movie?

On the surface these stories I ‘wrote’ for the Mirror.co.uk are light bits of celebrity fluff but beneath their starry surface there is something a little more sinister. The survey on which celebrity ‘the public’ would like ot see shoved in the medieval stocks was actually carried out by a company that runs castle a company who just happened to be holding a medieval themed event that weekend. The scientific polling process? Getting their staff to ask some people.

The headache piece tells a familiar tale. Carried out by Nurofen, a popular brand of ibuprofen you don’t have to be Einstein to work out the none to subtle message. If you have a headache – Paris Hilton induced or otherwise – ‘survey says’ you should probably take Nurofen over other painkillers. In fact Philip Davies, Senior Brand Manager of Nurofen supplied a helpful quote to hammer home this message (which funnily enough I did not use in the final article) he said: “Those looking for a painkiller and reaching for a paracetamol to relieve their headache could be making an error of judgement. Targeting headaches with Nurofen* is shown to provide faster and longer relief from headaches than standard paracetamol tablets.” Good to know huh?

For me as a journalism student some of this churnalism was a helpful excercise – teaching me to turn around a boring press release into a sharp, tight article at top speed in unfamiliar tabloid prose. But for the readers it’s not quite such a sweet deal. In fact I struggle to see the value in telling people that some people who were wondering around a castle one day would quite like to put Jordon in the stocks. Of course they would. She’s annoying. But does that fact in itself have enough journalistic merit to give a cheeky plug for a random medieval castle?

But there is a reason for this type of press release re-release – it provides brilliant SEO for the website and means that traffic flocks there from far and wide. It’s not about lazy journalism but more about sheer amounts of journalism. Journalists are creating a huge amount more content everyday for the web and the paper simultaneously. People, it seems, want to read about Paris Hilton, about Jonathan Ross, about Jordan or Cheryl or Ashley Cole, about Lindsay Lohan and Victoria Beckham and as long as these name draw traffic churnalising journalists will put them on their pages. And so, in the case of this post, will I.

Facebook-politics is no substitute for a good local paper

26 Apr

Standing in the baking sun on a north London High Street for six hours might not sound like your idea of cutting edge election coverage, but it was one of the most well received pieces of journalism that I have witnessed in this campaign.

Armed with little more than a bottle of water, some hastily purchased sun cream and a stack of red, yellow, blue and green pieces of paper we were carrying out an election poll for the seat of Hornsey and Wood Green.

Hampstead and Highgate Express

Hampstead and Highgate Express

After minutes we realised that we weren’t going to have to fight hard to encourage local voters to make their voices heard. These were the normal people on the street out buying their weekly shop or popping into the post office. They hadn’t joined a facebook group to show their disdain for Gordon Brown or commented on a spoof Tory Youtube video but we quicky got the distinct feeling they would have done if they were a little more Facebook savvy.

There was frustration on the streets which led to people coming up to our stall uninvited, asking questions and writing mini-essays explaining the causes of their alienation.

One man who told me how he had fought and been injured in WW2, how he had watch his commander, an old man at 26 die 10 days before the end of the war. He is 83 now and he was going to spoil his ballot. Why? A lifelong labour voter he feels betrayed on a national scale and alienated on a local level. The worst offence, he said was the letter he received on his 80th birthday telling him his pension was to be increased. By 25p a week.

Another woman told us that national politics held no sway over her anymore. They, she said, were career politicians interested in lining their politics and hiding their policies. She was voting simply on what her local candidates had to offer. Lynne Featherstone, the incumbent Lib Dem MP, is well regarded here, and this lady was no exception to this opinion.

She has been a good candidate fighting hard for local issues and bringing them to national attention when necessary. An expenses ‘saint’ she also held a lot of sway in terms of morality. The fact that she is the daughter of a millionaire and not exactly poorly off herself was never mentioned – it seems that there is not so much anger at people being over-paid or over-privilege but simply about the lack of honesty over that payment.

After four hours we had amassed almost 200 votes just from passersby. The ‘ballots’ were covered with scrawls of ‘change needed’ and ‘time for change’ suggested the locals were not immune from the national message being thrust down their throats. But hearteningly there were also comments that showed a real interest in national and local policies and in how these party’s would address their personal needs.

Four first time voters gave me a rush of pride in our long tradition of youthful social conscience. They said that they could see how Labour had made mistakes but expressed a belief that they couldn’t vote any other way than red. They believed in equality and in continued investment in the National Health Service, in education and in those struggling out of poverty. They said they knew that Conservatives would not provide this, no matter how friendly Cameron appeared to be.

That long sunny wait on a busy pavement showed me how important the local paper can be for empowering local voters. We could sense the gratitude people felt at the paper giving them a voice on local issues. Their willingness to speak out highlighted that, despite the shift towards US presidential politics, it was the response of their local MP to their struggles that really mattered in the long term. But these people do not want their worries exploited by the leaders as anecdotes for  ping-pong TV rallies. The voters want to be listened to by their local candidates and  for their local papers to make them heard.

Indeed the local parties would do well to read through our final cardboard box of ‘votes.’ It would tell them more about the state of mind of their constituents than any YouGov poll for utterly unbiased Sky News ever will.

UPDATE – I now work for Ham&High as a reporter but when I wrote this I was a lowly work experience with no renumeration. Flattery, it seems, will get you anywhere!